Categories
Math

Sine Angle Product Formula 3

In this post, we continue the discussion from a previous post about the existence of a suitable sine angle product identity.

With the help of ChatGPT, I realized that I was missing an obvious solution here, based just on periodicity. In fact, we can show a much stronger statement: not only is there no polynomial or rational identity in terms of \sin a,\cos a, \sin b,\cos b, there is no identity at all, period. \sin(ab) simply does not depend on those four alone (without a,b themselves.) More precisely:

Theorem. There is no function f:\mathbb{R}^4\rightarrow\mathbb{R} such that for all real a,b, \sin(ab)=f(\sin a, \cos a, \sin b, \cos b).

Proof. Assume such f existed. Fix a value of a, and define the one-variable function

\displaystyle g(b) = \sin(ab) = f\left( \sin a,\cos a,\sin b,\cos b \right).

For each a, we have

\displaystyle g(b + 2\pi) = f\left( \sin a,\cos a,\sin(b + 2\pi),\cos(b + 2\pi) \right)

\displaystyle = f\left( \sin a,\cos a,\sin b,\cos b \right)

\displaystyle = g(b),

so

\displaystyle \sin\left( a(b + 2\pi) \right) = \sin(ab)

for all a,b. But we clearly know this is false: either a(b + 2\pi) = ab + 2\pi k for some integer k or a(b + 2\pi) = (2k + 1)\pi - ab for some integer k, and there are real a,b that do not satisfy either of these. The proof is complete. \blacksquare

This resolves the question I had been asking. A similar proof can be made for the analogous statement where angle multiplication is replaced by angle division too.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.